The payment of settlement sums in a check bounce case has put actor Rajpal Yadav in hot water. Rajpal Naurang Yadav has been ordered by the Delhi High Court to appear before the concerned Jail Superintendent by February 4. He was ordered to revoke the tolerance that had previously been shown to him in a number of incidents involving check dishonor.
Due to his conviction in cases involving check bounces, Bollywood actor Rajpal Yadav has been ordered to appear before prison officials by February 4. The Delhi High Court noted that Rajpal Yadav disregarded the tribunal’s order despite having promised to return the complaint the specified sum of money.
Who is Rajpal Yadav?
Actor and comedian Rajpal Naurang Yadav was born in India on March 16, 1971. He made his breakthrough in a bad character in Ram Gopal Varma’s Jungle (2000). Despite being nominated for multiple prizes, including Filmfare and Screen prizes, Yadav has become well known for his slapstick comedic performances over the years.
What is the case all about?
According to Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, Yadav’s actions should be condemned because he consistently broke his promises to the court to reimburse the money to the complainant, M/s Murali Projects Pvt Ltd.
The judge ordered that the money already paid with the high court’s Registrar General be released in favor of the complainant, noting that Yadav had to pay Rs 1.35 crore in each of the seven cases against him.
The court stated in its ruling that two demand drafts (DDs) totaling Rs 75 lakh were submitted to the Registrar General in October 2025, and that Rs 9 crore was still owed.
Yadav has not complied with the directives issued from time to time, despite constantly offering promises and requesting this Court’s mercy. In the February 2 judgment, the court stated.
This Court finds no justification to continue the indulgence granted to the petitioner no. 1 earlier, especially in the case as the present one, where the petitioner no. 1 himself has admitted the liability and undertaken to repay the amount.
In the interest of justice, petitioner number one is instructed to appear before the relevant jail superintendent by February 4, 2026, at 4 p.m., in order to serve the sentence that the learned trial court has given him. The petitioners’ learned senior counsel requests this short indulgence, arguing that petitioner number one is currently working in Mumbai.
The actor’s attorney claimed that he had not been able to follow the court’s directives or the terms of the parties settlement.
The judge noted that he fairly conceded that Yadav was given many chances and that considerable leniency was demonstrated on various occasions when time was requested to deposit the settlement payment.
The court’s ruling was in response to revision petitions filed by Yadav and his spouse against a 2019 sessions court ruling that maintained their conviction by a local magistrate court in the April 2018 check bounce cases.
His conviction was temporarily deferred by the supreme court in June 2024, provided he took sincere and genuine measures to investigate the prospect of reaching a mutually agreeable settlement with the opposing side.
Also Read: Delhi Sees 509 Women 191 Minors Among 800+ Missing Cases in Early 2026
He was given a six month prison sentence by the magistrate’s court. Yadav’s attorney had claimed at the time that it was a legitimate deal to fund the making of a film that failed at the box office and caused significant financial losses.
Furthermore, the Court dismissed justifications that pointed to typographical or technical mistakes in demand drafts, noting that these explanations did not inspire confidence, especially given the persistent default trend. The Court was frequently notified that it was prepared to pay, and no application was filed for clarification or correction yet, new adjournments were requested without compliance.
Image courtesy: Instagram/Rajpal Yadav
